And to the dismay of the Liberals and NDP, it has nothing to do with alleged Tory 'scandals' or the 'untrustworthiness' of P.M. Stephen Harper.
![]() |
| P.M. Stephen Harper |
The question on everyone's mind, from the media to the voters is, is there an opposition coalition?
The original agreement, made just after the 2008 election, was snuffed out after a groundswell of opposition to the idea occurred from average Canadians.
But the agreement is still in effect, and doesn't technically expire until June of this year. Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff and his party's talking heads have rapidly denied any such intent this time around, and have found themselves spending the first few days of the campaign publicly disregarding any plans for a coalition at every turn.
But as blogger Steven C. Britton points out, we've heard all of this before. Ignatieff's denials are not succeeding in extinguishing the threat or possibility of a coalition in the minds of voters.
Canadians just don't buy the spin. Politically, the game has long been one of 'us' vs 'them'. No matter how many left-of-centre parties there are, the flavour of federal politics for many years has been a choice between conservatism and socialism. This time it's no different and the people know that. That's why the concept of a leftwing coalition isn't so hard for the average voter to believe.
![]() |
| Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff |
It would make it simpler - not to mention more honest - if the entities on the left stopped pretending they held vast ideological differences with each other, ended the roundabout coalition games, threw away the pretense and just formed a single party. Essentially, that's what we have now.
Put them all together, and you have a clear decision to make in May: the Conservative party vs. the Socialist party.
No matter how strong the denials, regardless the attempts at deflection, that is the choice Canadians will face at the ballot box.


3 comments :
May I suggest a slight change to your posts conclusion? You say that in May we have the choice of the Conservative party vs. the Socialist party. I would change the Conservative option to CINO Conservatives as that is surly what they are.
May I second Mr. Devine's comment? The Conservatives are surely better than the Opposition, but they're only conservative by comparison to Ignatieff and Layton.
Unless deficit running is the new conservative, that is.
Voting for the least worst party undermines the very idea of voting. That type of voting keeps corrupt systems alive long after they should end.
Much better to not vote, to not give legitimacy to a party or a system that is working against your interests.
If you vote, you are saying you agree with that party, that system and what it has done and what it promises to do. Even if you don't agree with that your vote will be, and is, viewed in that way.
Post a Comment