Saturday, October 17, 2009

Decision '09: The Post-Mortem

Today was the culmination of five months of a leadership campaign, thousands of hours devoted by hundreds, interest in a non-P.C. race like never before. It was the finish line for two tireless candidates and their teams.


Now, I’d like to add my congratulations to Danielle Smith. I had the feeling from the start of this race that I was witnessing the rise of the next serious player in Alberta’s political scene, each coffee or phone chat reinforcing that belief.

Her victory signals the arrival of both Danielle and the Wildrose Alliance. Fringe no more (a label I never really accepted), the party has justified its surprising position in recent polls. It has erased any thoughts of the Calgary-Glenmore by-election as being a ‘fluke’ or strictly a protest vote.

The dynamic new party now has a dynamic new leader. The surge of the Wildrose Alliance continues.

Regarding Mark Dyrholm…

He may be the ‘non-winner’, but I would suggest that Mark did, in fact, score a victory. The effort he and his team put into this race was almost surreal. I doubt that I have ever been witness to such an example of effort and commitment than what I saw here.

Mark never backed down from his assertions, never waivered from a position no matter the potential controversy. He proved what I had always suspected: while Mark was my second choice in this race, I still rank him above any of the other provincial party leaders.

One of my primary questions from the beginning has not been who would win. The issue was what would happen post-vote.

Would the coalition that makes us the party we are – proud libertarian and social conservative all – come through the hard-fought battle enough intact to repair and renew?

It was clear who had won when Mark Dyrholm was the first to step up to the podium. Tradition dictates that the concession speech precedes the acceptance speech. It was the words and the commitment Mark expressed that answered those questions.

In fact, Dyrholm made me wonder, because of the intensity of the battle, if the party had come out the other side actually strengthened. The fact that he accepted defeat with style and professionalism isn’t surprising. It’s was his public declaration that “…Danielle Smith is my leader!” that signaled the solidarity of this brash new party.

Mr. Dyrholm, I tip my hat to you.

I believe that moment, combined with Danielle’s victory, also signaled the beginning of the end of almost four full decades of Progressive Conservative rule in Alberta. All indications are that the Wildrose Alliance is one solid, unified party, which could mean a very bumpy future for Steady Eddie Stelmach. Sphere: Related Content

9 comments:

Werner Patels said...

The best candidate has, indeed, won!!!!

Eleanor said...

I thought Mark's concession speech was a real class act. He displayed a humourous side of himself I hadn't seen before. I think the right candidate won for the advance of the party but good job, Mark. I respect you for being in the race at all, and for your graciousness in accepting the will of members. I hope you are considering a seat in the Leg.

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child said...

Mark's entire day showed a side of him most people hadn't been able to see. I'm working on a blogpost for mid-next week on this same topic, but basically a huge block keeping the Dyrholm campaign from succeeding was his campaign manager. A good campaign manager gets credit for his successes. An excellent campaign manager's efforts go unnoticed by even his own mother. And a bad campaign manager results in a large number of unkind jokes whispered with giggles as his massive frame maneuvred around the crowd.

Patrick Ross said...

Mark Dyrholm did the right thing by backing Smith after his defeat.

Now, she needs to do the same thing -- by giving him a role in the party befitting of his talents.

But for God's sake, keep Craig Chandler away from the media.

Karen said...

Patrick,

Craig Chandler wrote Mark's speech and he is the reason why Mark did the right thing.

The race is over. Leave it alone.

Patrick Ross said...

Craig Chandler was also the guy suggesting he would be purged from the party if Mark Dyrholm didn't win.

With his history, god only knows what he'll do next. But one thing is certain: working with the media isn't his strong point.

Leigh Patrick Sullivan said...

After such an intense campaign a little downtime is natural. I think we should give all the players at least that much.

Personally, I think Craig has some incredible attributes that would benefit the party. Unity is the key to our success, and without minds open to other ideas, ideologies, and concepts, we are nowhere.

If anyone has a general or specific issue with the party, be it the handling of the election to other matters, I know the exec is always open to communication. Perhaps a direct email to party brass with concerns instead of airing them in the comments section of a blog article would provide a higher chance of satisfaction.

Kimberly said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Tym_Machine said...

Hi Patrick,

A very popular French Canadian web site is talking about the Wildrose Alliance and I invite you to have a look at this article, it's worth using google translation or any other translation device as a matter of fact:

http://www.leblogueduql.org/2009/10/une-libertarienne-comme-pm-de-lalberta.html

Best regards,

Tym Machine